SIR — Re Dean and Dyball's proposals for the development of Watchet's East Quay, I was saddened by the lack of imagination and the lost opportunity these plans reveal.

It is no secret that the East Quay represents Watchet's last chance for a major development to trigger off the regeneration of the town.

It has always been apparent that the majority of the town did not want housing on the East Quay.

In the referendum nearly 70 per cent voted against it and at the public inquiry the inspector commented 'the majority of residents have consistently opposed the inclusion of housing on the East Quay . . . '

With a marina a reality, it seems obvious that a scheme is necessary to enhance the possibility of its success. It's unlikely that people will flock to the town to see a housing estate.

It is quite clear that Dean and Dyball will make a large amount of money from this development. What do the people of Watchet get?

Watchet needs a reason for visitors and tourists to visit the town, it desperately needs jobs, and if we are to give away a valuable asset we should at the very least have a facility that will be an asset to the town as a whole.

To build a housing estate on the East Quay is not going to benefit its inhabitants in any way. Who will live in these houses? It is a clear possibility that it may become a ghost estate for half the year.

It seems a great shame that those in a position to influence decisions over this development have ignored the wishes of those of us who live in Watchet and hold it in great affection.

I fear that the promises of jobs and other advantages to the town will come to nothing.

Nick Cotton,

Swain Street,

Watchet.